Electrophysiological and Behavioural Responses of Anomala dimidiata to Three Host Plant’s Volatiles

Authors

  • Nending Muni Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Itanagar 791112, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
  • Jharna Chakravorty Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Itanagar 791112, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
  • Yallappa Rajashekar Insect Bioresource Laboratory, Animal Bioresources Programme, Institute of Bioresources and Sustainable Development, Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, Takyelpat, Imphal 795001, Manipur, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.959

Keywords:

Allelochemical, Electroantennogram, Leaf-Chafer, Kairomone, Kiwi Fruit, Plantation, Phytophagous, Rutelinae, White Grub, Baited Trap, Attraction.

Abstract

The electrophysiological and behavioural responses of Anomala dimidiata (Coleoptera: Rutelinae) were studied for its host kiwi plant’s (Actinidia deliciosa) three volatiles, (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol, Linalool, and (-)-α-Pinene. This experiment comprises electroantennographic assay using EAG and field testing in the Kiwi Horticulture field using synthetic compounds. In EAG assays, all three test compounds elicit significant responses with 55.66±3.41% for (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol, 44.97±1.08% for Linalool, and 53.75±0.33% for (-)-α-Pinene in male beetles and 54.82±3.52% for (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol, 44.97±0.30% for Linalool and 53.75±4.69% for (-)-α-Pinene in females beetles as compare to reference compound. In the field testing, (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol baited traps caught maximum beetles while (-)-α-Pinene-baited traps had significantly less number of beetles attracted to them. Linalool-baited traps caught 60.1% fewer beetles than (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol baited traps but 62.7% more beetles than (-)-α-Pinene- baited traps. This study concludes that (Z)-3-Hexen-1-ol is a potential attractant host plant volatile for A. dimidiata.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Nending Muni, Department of Zoology, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Itanagar 791112, Arunachal Pradesh, India.

PhD. Scholar of Department of Zoology Department, Rajiv Gandhi University, Arunachal Pradesh, under the supervision of Prof. Jharna Chakravorty.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-19

How to Cite

Muni, N., Chakravorty, J., & Rajashekar, Y. (2023). Electrophysiological and Behavioural Responses of <i>Anomala dimidiata</i> to Three Host Plant’s Volatiles. Indian Journal of Entomology, 86(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.959

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Agrawal A A. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294(5541): 321-326.

Bernays E A, Chapman R F. 1994. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. London: Chapman & Hall. 312 pp.

Bernays E A, Funk D J. 1999. Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 266(1415). pp. 151-156.

Bruce T J A, Pickett J A. 2011. Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects- finding the right mix. Phytochemistry 72(13): 1605-1611.

Carrasco D, Larsson M C, Anderson P. 2015. Insect host plant selection in complex environments. Current Opinion in Insect Science 8: 1-7.

Chandra K, Gupta D. 2012. Pleurostict scarabs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): new distributional records in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. Check List 8(5): 889-893.

Cherry R, Klein M, Leal W. 1996. Attraction of adult Anomala marginata (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) to anethole. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 13: 359-364.

Crocker R L, Klein M G, Xu W, Jailon W T. 1999. Attraction of Phyllophaga congrua, Phyllophaga crassissima, Phyllophaga crinite, and Cyclocephala lurida(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) adults to selected volatile compounds. Southwestern Entomologist 24: 315-319.

Devanda M, Mandyam S, Jayashankar M. 2022. New location reports of Anomala dimidiata ssp. dimidiata(Hope, 1831) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Insect Environment 25(1).

Du Y, Grodowitz M J, Chen J. 2019. Electrophysiological responses of eighteen species of insects to fire ant alarm pheromone. Insects 10: 403

Forister M L, Novotny V, Panorska A K, Baje L, Basset Y, Butterill P T, Cizek L, Coley P D, Dem F, Diniz I R, Drozd P. 2015. The global distribution of diet breadth in insect herbivores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 13:112(2): 442-7.

Hoekman D, LeVan K E, Gibson C, Ball G E, Browne R A, Davidson R L, Erwin T L, Knisley C B, LaBonte J R, Lundgren J, Maddison D R. 2017. Design for ground beetle abundance and diversity sampling within the National Ecological Observatory Network. Ecosphere 8(4): e01744.

Jyothi K N, Prasuna A L, Sighamony S, Kumari B K, Prasad A R, Yadav J S. 2002. Electroantennogram responses of Apanteles obliquae (Hym., Braconidae) to various infochemicals. Journal of Applied Entomology 126(4): 175-181.

Klein M G, Tumlinson J H, Ladd Jr T L, Doolittle R E. 1981. Japanese beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): response to synthetic sex attractant plus phenethyl propionate: eugenol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7(7).

Leal W S. 1998. Chemical ecology of phytophagous scarab beetles. Annual review of entomology 43(1): 39-61.

Leal W S, Sawada M, Matsuyama S, Kuwahara Y, Hasegawa M. 1993. Unusual periodicity of sex pheromone production in the large black chafer Holotrichia parallela. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19(7): 1381-1391.

Li W, Yang L, Shen X, Yuan Y, Yuan G, Luo M, Guo X (2013) Prescription screening and field evaluation of broadspectrum attractants of scarab beetles from Ricinus communis. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 21: 480-486.

Murali-Baskaran R K, Sharma K C, Kaushal P, Kumar J, Parthiban P, Senthil-Nathan S, Mankin R W. 2018. Role of kairomone in biological control of crop pests-A review. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 101: 3-15.

Olsson S B, Hansson B S. 2013. Electroantennogram and single sensillum recording in insect antennae. In Pheromone signaling Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey. pp. 157-177.

Rahman A, Bathari M, Borah P, Taye R R, Patgiri P. 2017. Diversity of insect species along with their host in Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5: 2307-2312.

Roelofs W L. 1984. Electroantennogram assays: rapid and convenient screening procedures for pheromones. In Techniques in pheromone research, Springer, New York. pp. 131-159.

Ruther J, Mayer C J. 2005. Response of garden chafer, Phyllopertha horticola, to plant volatiles: from screening to application. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115(1): 51-59.

Sharma P K, Shah M L, Mishra A K. 2021. Biology of white grub Anomala dimidiata(Hope)(Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in agricultural ecosystem, Doon Valley (UK), India. Environment Conservation Journal 22(1, 2): 147-151.

Singh A, Patel R K, Verma M R. 2008. Popularising kiwifruit cultivation in North East. Envis Bulletin Himalayan Ecology 16(1): 18.

Sushil S N, Mohan M, Selvakumar G, Bhatt J C. 2006. Relative abundance and host preference of white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Kumaon hills of Indian Himalayas. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76:338-339.

Tumlinson J H, Klein M G, Doolittle R E, Ladd T L, Proveaux A T. 1977. Identification of the female Japanese beetle sex pheromone: inhibition of male response by an enantiomer. Science 197(4305): 789-92.

Vuts J, Imrei Z, Birkett M A, Pickett J A, Woodcock C M, Tóth M. 2014. Semiochemistry of the Scarabaeoidea. Journal of Chemical Ecology 40: 190-210

Weber D C, Konstantinov A S, Khrimian A, Bier A D, Lubenow L A, Knodel J J, Haber A I, Wallingford A K, Mason J A, Kuhar T P. 2022. Trapping of Crucifer-Feeding Flea Beetles (Phyllotreta spp.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) With Pheromones and Plant Kairomones. Journal of Economic Entomology 115(3): 748-56.